Delegate the work. Keep the judgment.
A scorecard tool for engineering teams. The measuring is automated, the judgment stays with the coach.
Product details
- Type
- SaaS
- Status
- Live · since 2026
- Works in
- Browser
- Stack
- Laravel · Inertia · Vue
Why it exists
Cranely is deliberately the counterexample in my own work. Everywhere else I delegate the execution to agents; here the judgment itself is the product.
Delegate the work, keep judgment where it matters.
How it works
One pillar, three sources, one judgment.
The Operational Excellence pillar of a CTO programme: three indicators, each with the measured numbers beneath it.
What it does
Structure
Pillars and indicators
A scorecard is built from pillars, with indicators underneath them, each carrying a score from 0 to 10.
- Pillars
- Indicators
- Score 0 to 10
Evidence
Sources under every score
Under each indicator sit the measured numbers that back it up. Every value needs a note: where did this come from?
- Sources
- Note per measurement
Judgment
The judgment stays with the coach
Scores, attention points and actions cannot be changed automatically. They belong in the conversation between coach and team.
- Attention points
- Actions
What it looks like
Three screens, no manual.
From the conversation to the measurement to the series.
Also through MCPCranely talks to your assistant too. Recording measurements and reading scorecards works through an MCP server, the same technique as the Connector. The scores stay handwork there as well.
See the ConnectorBuilt here, run here.
What I build here for myself, I also build for organisations that want to take AI beyond the pilot.